All articles about 上海约妹号

Tony Becca: Ashes to ashes, dust to dust

first_imgIn the early days before the 2015 Ashes got under way, England were playing so badly and Australia so well that Australia were installed as favourites to win the coveted urn. By the time Australia had dominated the World Cup, however, by the time they ran rough-shod over the West Indies, especially with England suffering badly during that time, losing to Bangladesh and not coming out of the first round of the World Cup, and when they were later bowled out of for 123 in the second innings and lost to the West Indies at Kensington Oval, the Aussies were riding high, very high. The Australians, with Steven Smith, Michael Clarke, David Warner, Chris Rogers, and Shane Watson as batsmen, and with a pace attack to come from pacers Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Pat Cummins, Peter Siddle, and spinner Nathan Lyon, were overwhelming favourites not only to win the Ashes, but also to demolish England. Smith and Warner, especially, were expected to smash Jimmy Anderson, Stuart Broad, and company to all parts of England, from Cardiff to the Oval and back again, and Johnson, Starc, and company were expected to destroy Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, and Joe Root. For Australia, it would be, or it was supposed to be, almost like taking candy from a new-born babe. The critics of England, however, including myself, who expected the scoreline to be 3-0 or 4-0 in Australia’s favour, had forgotten a few things: we had forgotten that the ‘fat lady’ had not even warmed up as yet, we had forgotten that the series was not being played in Australia, and we had forgotten that it was being played in England where the conditions usually favour the home team. We had also forgotten the glorious uncertainty of cricket, the many thrilling and exciting surprises it sometimes has in store for its fans. We also forgot that playing cricket in England is like playing in no other place, not even, probably, in New Zealand, and we also forgot the importance of winning the toss and what to do when you have won it. England, after warming up with a drawn 1-1 series against a plucky New Zealand, completely and shockingly overturned the form book in winning the Ashes, 3-2, in no uncertain manner, a result which led to the retirement of the humbled Australian captain. MOTHER OF ALL BEATINGS MAGNIFICENT CATCHING After surprisingly winning the first Test in Cardiff by 169 runs, and after losing their way in a 405-run thrashing at Lord’s, a loss which suggested that the Australians were back and that England’s victory at Cardiff was just a mirage, England came out firing and won the third and fourth Test matches, one at Edgbaston by eight wickets, one at Trent Bridge by an innings and 78 runs, before losing the fifth Test at The Oval by an innings and 46 runs. It was, all things considered, probably the mother of all beatings. It is true Australia made 566 for eight declared with Smith stroking 215 at Lord’s and 481 at The Oval with Smith getting 143, but they made nothing else to write home about. The mighty Australia, the never-say-die Australia, the team which hardly ever bowed to anyone, were dismissed, apart from the Lord’s and Oval Test matches, almost without a fight and for scores of 308 and 242, 136 and 265, and for 60 and 253. In fact, the entire series was peculiar, with three Test matches ending in four days and two in three, and with the losing team, Australia, also winning two Test matches easily and convincingly. It is true that the pitches at Edgbaston and Trent Bridge were tailor-made for England’s seamers, but the English bowlers used them wonderfully. Unlike the Australian bowlers, who are accustomed to hard, fast, bouncy pitches, the English bowlers pitched the ball up and got it to swing and to seam. At Edgbaston, the conditions were just what England ordered. They bowled first, and Anderson, with six for 47 in the first innings, and Steven Finn, with six for 79 in the second innings, buried Australia. At Trent Bridge, and with Anderson out, the pitch was again just what England ordered and the conditions were in their favour. They again bowled after losing the toss, and Stuart Broad nailed them unceremoniously. In one of the great spells of bowling, Broad ambushed Australia and cut them down for a paltry 60 runs with figures of 9.3 overs, five maidens, 15 runs, and eight wickets. Some, including the Australian batsmen, may blame the pitch, but although the conditions changed a bit after Australia had batted, especially at Trent Bridge, when it is remembered that England were 274 for four at close on the opening day, it must have been fast bowling, pure and simple, at its best: two wickets in the first over of the match, five wickets in 19 balls, 29 for six in the first 35 minutes, and Australia dismissed in 18.3 overs in 93 minutes, 27 minutes before lunch. The England catching was brilliant, or rather magnificent, especially one taken by Ben Stokes at fifth slip to dismiss Adam Voges off Broad. With Broad pitching the ball up and getting it to swing, every one of his wickets, all eight, were caught in the slips. Like Finn at Edgbaston, who backed up Anderson with six second-innings wickets, Stokes also bowled well at Trent Bridge and took six second-innings wickets. The toss is usually blamed for such embarrassment but this time that could not have been the case. England won the toss at Cardiff and batted first, and Australia won the toss at Lord’s and batted first. Australia, however, again won the toss at Edgbaston, batted first, made 136, and lost the match, and at Trent Bridge, England won the toss, sent Australia to bat, bundled them out for 60, and won the match. At that stage, it was 3-1 for England, with the Ashes decided in the third and fourth Test matches when Australia, for whatever reason, won the toss in the third Test and batted, and England, with good reason, won the toss in the fourth and bowled first. Sixty all out was embarrassing, especially in an Ashes series, and as it turned out, it was dust to dust, ashes to ashes for Australia. It was a case of, in a series of relatively poor batting, and if Anderson and Broad didn’t get you, then Finn or Stokes must. The usually proud and arrogant Aussies will remember this contest for a long, long time; one that England will also always remember, probably forever.last_img read more

Olson is still finding his way

first_imgGood, but not a top-20 team. “I was really impressed with how our team responded late in the game when we needed to kind of buckle in,” Dorrell said. “That’s a great, great sign of a team that’s learning how to finish.” UCLA does deserve credit for not folding, which is what Bruin teams of recent vintage may have done. “Offensively, we struggled,” Dorrell said. No argument here. None whatsoever. UCLA has a very, very good defense. It might even be very, very, very good. The offense is very, very average. It must get better for the Bruins to become major players on the college football scene. The offensive line is underwhelming. It is not loaded with can’t-miss NFL prospects. BYU’s defense made that clear. The play at quarterback was uninspiring, to say the least. Because everything on offense starts with the quarterback, because that’s where the focus is, Ben Olson will be the recipient of the most heat. Jay Norvell, the new offensive coordinator, will be second in line. Olson’s reaction to knocks on Norvell? “He called a good game,” he said. Olson’s reaction to knocks on himself? “I’m learning,” he said. “We needed to pull it out.” And they did. “We had a hard time,” he said. “We had fun.” That’s what counts right now. That and the fact that UCLA is 2-0. What also counts is the manner in which Dorrell and Norvell are patiently bringing Olson along. He’s a 24-year-old man who is close to gaining tenure at UCLA. He played his last high school season in 2002. But he’s pretty raw for a college quarterback. He’s only a junior. His five starts last year before getting knocked out with a knee injury were his only five college starts before this season. So expecting him to be a polished product is expecting far too much. Olson needs some work on his passing mechanics. His arm motion is long and slow. This gives defensive backs a step or two when they break on the ball as he throws. It also prompts him to rush his delivery, which causes some passes to go every which way except to the intended receivers. Think Jim Everett, the quarterback for the Rams back when they played in Anaheim. Everett was 6-foot-5. Olson is 6-4. Everett had similar problems with his mechanics. The harder he tried to deliver the ball quicker, the more his accuracy suffered. Olson needs to shorten his delivery and at the same time keep his feet in synch with his arm, something Everett never learned. The key is working on that without making him a basket case, as happened to Everett. Dorrell understands. That’s why he is so positive when he talks about Olson. That’s why he talks about how his team responded with a fourth-quarter touchdown to hold off BYU. That’s why he points to Olson’s leadership. That’s why he says the play calling could have been better. He wants to take the heat off his quarterback. Norvell is proving to be a savvy play caller. He had Olson throw short, safe passes early on to get a feel for the game. He then had Olson throw down the field. The Bruins aired the ball out more times in one quarter than USC did in its opening game against Idaho. Norvell also expanded the UCLA attack to five receivers at times. He did play it safe and sane in the fourth quarter, when the Bruins were sealing the win. With support like this, Olson has a better than average chance. You can appreciate his view of the game. “It’s not like we beat a double-A team,” he said. Better yet, it’s not like UCLA lost to a I-AA team. [email protected] local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set! Dorrell could have been talking to his players. They got lost Saturday against BYU before finding their way in time to pull out a 27-17 victory that was much closer than the score seems to indicate. That’s “lost” as in going from comfortably ahead at 20-0 to squirming at 20-17. “It was a hard-fought win,” Dorrell said. Harder than it should have been if UCLA is a top-10 team. “I knew this team (BYU) was a good team,” he said. Sometimes you need a map. Just ask Karl Dorrell, UCLA’s football coach. “Try not to get lost,” he said. He was talking to reporters who had to find their way from the interview room to the lockers in new tunnels in facilities below the Rose Bowl that have been torn down and rebuilt since the end of last season. last_img read more